Tuesday, August 25, 2020
Week 6 Term 3 - The Last Dance
Thursday, August 13, 2020
Week 3 Term 3 - Climate Change
CLIMATE CHANGE
Climate change describes a change in the average conditions such as temperature and rainfall. Human activity is increasingly influencing climate change through activity such as the cutting down of rain forests and the burning of fossil fuels like natural oils, gas and coal.
NASA states that "Increased heat, drought and insect outbreaks, all linked to climate change, have increased wildfires. Declining water supplies, reduced agricultural yields, health impacts in cities due to heat, and flooding and erosion in coastal areas are additional concerns." It is evident that climate change has and is a global issue that continues to have an impact on how we live and what we live in.
CURRENT CLIMATE IN PACIFIC EDUCATION
The Government have released the Action Plan for Pacific Education 2030 Vision. This plan follows from the Tapasa document.
There are 6 objectives for the education system and each system has 5 key shifts that is needed to meet the goals of the plan. The overall vision of the action plan is to align objectives with school's strategic plan, goals and vision.
I can only speak on my view on the current state of Pacific education. I believe that the current system for Pacific learners in secondary education is one that is working for some but at the same time needs to change. The needs of our Pacific learners is changing and the demands to improve literacy is one particular need that is increasing. In my experience I have seen the literacy gap widen with many of the Pacific learners starting college well below the national average in literacy. The current system in the way it tests our Pacific learners needs to change (the writing prompts and topics for the test in particular). The education system needs to be one that is inclusive of the needs of not just the Pacific learners but also of their families and communities.
The action plan will only function well if all are on board. The current climate in society is divided with the Black Lives Matter movement. The movement is based on the advocating and protesting against police brutality and racial motivated violence against Black people. There are differing perspectives on this movement with people for or against it. The concept of 'black lives matter' has created a division in society where for some people they believe that all lives matter.
In the same light when it comes to the action plan for pacific education - one may question - what about the rest? The rest do matter. Their needs, values and communities are just as important. Ayana Lage says "No one's saying that your life doesn't matter. What we're saying...is all lives matter until black lives matter." Pacific education is an area that is in crisis and it is vital that this crisis is addressed and that all involved are on the same page and work towards bringing a solution to the problem.
Tamaki College's student body is 64% Pacific (Tonga, Samoa, Cook Island, Niue, Fijian, Tuvalu, Tokelau). As an educator, a Pacific educator - my pedagogy is based on the cultural system and values that I was born into. The key value of respect and hierarchy (knowing your place) are two values that I bring into my practice. I hope to see that the action plan will help bring those core values into the classroom, that the Pacific students can work and experience a system that is inclusive of what they know, who they are and what they need.
Thursday, July 23, 2020
Week 1 Term 3 - TRAITS
Tuesday, July 14, 2020
Week 12 Term 2 - It's done
Thursday, June 25, 2020
Week 11 Term 2 - Proactive > Reactive
Thursday, June 18, 2020
Week 10 Term 2 - #Trending
Returning to school in Alert Level 2 was exciting and daunting. Exciting in that I was able to break out of my bubble, see my colleagues and work with the students. It was also daunting in that I knew that there was a huge task ahead of me, reintegrating my students back with the learning.
One class in particular that I was concerned about was my Level 2 English class. All through the lock-down period my online classes for my Level 2 English class would usually consist of 2 to 3 students. Most days I had 1 dedicated student who would show up to every class. It was disheartening and frustrating. I knew that when that when we had to return to school that this particular class (Level 2 English) would be the class where I would need to intervene, a turn around and acceleration for achievement was needed.
In my attempt to understand WHY there was disengagement from my Level 2 students, we had a open discussion in our first face-to-face lesson. The most common trend that I noticed from their feedback was that they did not have a working device and were waiting for a loan device. A small percentage of my class did a have a device but chose not to engage with online learning. The findings from the discussion (I wish I had created an online survey so I could have a record of it) although disappointing was important for me to know. Understanding the trend, whether it is favorable or not to what you are working with, is important because it help you understand the context, highlight the areas of improvement and what I have learned to understand and enjoy in that it can show you what is working. This here is where you can capitalize on the strengths and use that to drive what is needed.
I had little to work with the feedback I was given so my next point was to negotiate. I sat with each student and asked them to share their assessment, went through each assessment and highlighted the areas that they needed to work on and then negotiate a date and time that they would like for me to review their work and to give my final feedback. This negotiation was good for me because I felt that I needed to give the responsibility to the students and enable them to feel empowered to drive the assessment - I will facilitate. Once I complete my final feedback we would then negotiate again to confirm a final date for the student to submit their final draft.
Throughout week 6, 7 and 8 the students were able to turn things around and complete their first Level 2 English internal assessment. Out of a class of 20, 18 have passed. Reflecting on this increase in achievement, I believe that my student's respond best to the face-to-face learning. Online learning has been a part of our school for the last 10 years and I think going forward students and teachers need to buy in and engage. I also believe that my students responded well to the negotiation process as it gave them something to be accountable to and work towards. The one-on-one feedback discussions - both in person and online - was helpful for them and for myself.
In Week 4 (May 4 - 8) the break down of our results looked like this:
Level 1 English
- Students with 0 Credits - 62
- Students with 3 Credits - 11
- Students with 4 Credits - 29
- Students with 6 Credits - 1
- Students with 7 Credits - 12
- Students with 10 Credits - 6
- Students with Level 1 Literacy - 34
- Students with 0 Credits - 88
- Students with 3 Credits - 11
- Students with 0 Credits - 63
- Students with 3 Credits - 4
- Students with 0 Credits - 34
- Students with 3 Credits - 14
- Students with 4 Credits - 6
- Students with 5 Credits - 1
- Students with 6 Credits - 10
- Students with 7 Credits - 22
- Students with 10 Credits - 22
- Students with 13 Credits - 3
- Students with 17 Credits - 2
- Students with Level 1 Literacy - 64
- Students with 0 Credits - 45
- Students with 3 Credits - 45
- Students with 4 Credits - 1
- Students with 5 Credits - 3
- Students with 7 Credits - 1
- Students with 17 Credits - 1
- Students with 0 Credits - 53
- Students with 3 Credits - 16
Tuesday, June 16, 2020
Changing the narrative
One of the dilemmas when it comes to teaching students how to craft a text is that they cannot see whole the picture. The lack of perspective and attention to detail - whether it is through creative or formal writing - and understanding of the 'who, what, where, when and why' in a narrative can suffocate student's in their writing. I am certain that all English Literature/Language teachers can relate and understand this. Assessment feedback is usually marked by repetitive guiding questions, highlighting grammatical errors - it can seem like an endless and tedious list of 'corrections to be made.' But without this (correction and order), students would not be able learn and amend what needs to be corrected.
An assessment that I am currently marking is AS 91480 (Close Viewing) for Level 3 English. At times I feel like I am rehashing the same feedback and it can be draining going through the same content BUT there is a silver lining in all of this. The dialogue online and in person with my students around the feedback has helped to improve their narrative writing, their opinion and take on the assessment. For some the result is immediate and for others it takes time to sink in, nonetheless this conversation around the correction needed with their narrative is important. Without it the students would not have the right tools to make the improvement that is required. It isn't rocket science, this is a give-in with all teachers. Constructive feedback results in better learning outcomes.
Students would not be able to develop and build on their argument without the guiding questions. Students would not be able to understand that their perspective is needed and important in understanding their topic without the questioning or challenging their opinion. When crafting a text conversational teaching and learning is important to nurture the narrative. This is all part of a healthy discourse in a teacher/student relationship that ultimately is geared towards providing a favorable outcome for the student. In order for the desired outcome to come to light (to be more engaged with writing, to be more critical when analyzing a text - just to name a few) - constructive feedback, correction and order is needed from teachers. It needs to be authentic and specific to the student's needs and ability. The students need to be able to understand the expectation and the teacher needs to communicate this effectively.
This lack of perspective and awareness of 'who, what, when, where and why' is not just an isolated issue in the English literature classroom. This is an issue and concern that is ingrained in behavioral issues outside of the classroom. Our youth live in a world where the culture around them (no I am not referencing their heritage) but the youth culture - is a space where the need to prove and publicize every move and every event is as teenagers say 'Bible'. The urbanized definition of 'Bible' is not associated with the stories of God and faith but is a term where it is 'used to express ultimate honesty, or to show that you are not playing around. Derived from the act of swearing on the Bible.' Our young people are impressionable and influenced by behavior and attitudes that at most times can have a negative impact on their perspective and understanding of the world and their place in it. Their ability to make sound decisions - decisions that show a degree of compassion towards others - is measured by this culture that dictates otherwise. When they are corrected or reminded that this attitude is unacceptable, they struggle to understand 'how' or 'who' they have affected.
The narrative that our young people write for themselves can be incredibly frustrating especially when educators, mentors and the community are trying to push them to drive a new narrative. With my students the gaps in their written narrative are gaps that have been addressed before but the 'correction' provided does not seem to stick. From the classroom to world, this gap is often seen in the poor behavior and choices that our young people fall for time and time again. The narrative at some point becomes a resurgence of the same story, same plot, same antagonist, same protagonist, same villain and the ending - well, much of the same. What will it take to change the narrative?
Changing the narrative for the behavior of our young people is a process. It is an ever evolving process that requires patience, vision and leadership. It is an undertaking but like constructive feedback with writing, young people need constructive feedback with their behavior. They need to understand that there are consequences for their actions. Correction and order is needed in order for the change in the narrative to be effective. If we aspire of an alternate ending, the road to getting there may require hard truth and consequences to be implemented. In the written narrative, the power of WORDS can influence the shift in the plot and in the development of the character. How we correct and speak to our young people can have a lasting impression on how they see themselves. With writing it is easy to accelerate the outcome and to see the end the result. In dealing with young people, I cannot say that this result will act immediately. However WORDS do have power and it is important that not just teachers but all those in influential roles and those who are responsible for young people, that they use their words well to correct what needs to be corrected. To help alternate the ending and change the narrative.
Week 9 Term 2 - Totara House: Samoan Language Week 2026 - Understanding our House Value of Unity through the concept of Fealofani (June 08 - June 12)
Totara House SLW Au Siva 2026 The concept of fealofani in the Samoan culture goes beyond a simple gathering or coming together; it is deeply...
-
Reflection and evaluation are two important parts of teaching practice. It is an important part of mine, however I am not good at recording ...
-
Viviane Robinson states "The more leaders focus on their relationships, their work, and their learning on the core business of teach...
-
I have only just started blogging. Why? For a while, I have felt this need to write my reflections and thoughts on my teaching pract...
